Journal aesthetics art criticism online dating
In addition to naturalizing culture, this move overdetermines how ‘gay’ and ‘straight’ are coded.For it fails to recognize that people who choose to go on a dating site will likely post photos of themselves that can be easily understood through sexualized stereotypes, which they may or may not perform in other on- and off-line contexts.
Our willingness to accept that there are such things as coherent sexes, genders, and sexual orientations stems not only from our imaginaries about sex, gender and sexuality but also from our imaginary about the possibility and existence of coherent identities.
What may be less obvious to many reading the study are some of the other ways biases are created via coding errors or are written into the facial recognition algorithm.
For example, the study restricts the range of sexual orientations, sexes and genders to neat yet inaccurate binaries: gay and straight, male and female, masculine and feminine.
This helps explain how sexual orientation was reduced to the binary ‘gay’ or ‘straight’ and how the Stanford study reaffirmed its pre-determined knowledge about the existence of ‘gay’ and ‘straight’ people.
Moves like this one didn’t start with the Stanford study.
Search for journal aesthetics art criticism online dating:
Answer 3: Imaginaries When dubious scientific techniques and the knowledge claims they produce are supported by social and cultural prejudices, they tend to gain credibility and lodge themselves more deeply into wider fields of understanding – from science to medicine to law to social policy.